NISSA RENOV : revenue, balance sheet and financial ratios

NISSA RENOV is a French company founded 11 years ago, specialized in the sector Construction de maisons individuelles. Based in NICE (06200), this company of category PME shows in 2016 a revenue of 57 k€. Find below the complete financial statements, solvency ratios, working capital requirements and sector comparison.

Data updated on 2026-04-11

Sources : INPI & INSEE SIRENE - Processing : Ministry of Economy

Financial history - NISSA RENOV (SIREN 810991588)
Indicator 2016 2015
Revenue 57 153 € 10 067 €
Net income -718 € 21 €
EBITDA -551 € 11 €
Net margin -1.3% 0.2%

Revenue and income statement

In 2016, NISSA RENOV achieves revenue of 57 k€. Vs 2015, growth of +468% (10 k€ -> 57 k€). After deducting consumption (15 k€), gross margin stands at 42 k€, i.e. a rate of 73%. This ratio measures the ability to generate value from commercial activity. EBITDA (= Gross margin - Personnel expenses - Taxes) reaches -551 €, representing -1.0% of revenue. Negative EBITDA means operations do not cover current expenses: concerning situation. Net income is negative at -718 € (-1.3% of revenue), which will impact equity.

Revenue (2016) ?
Revenue
Definition
Total amount of sales of goods and services made by the company.
Formula
Sales of goods + Sold production

57 153 €

Gross margin (2016) ?
Gross margin
Definition
Difference between revenue and cost of goods sold.
Formula
Revenue - Cost of goods consumed

41 703 €

EBITDA (2016) ?
Gross Operating Surplus (EBITDA)
Definition
Resources generated by current operations, before depreciation and financial expenses.
Formula
Value added - Personnel expenses - Taxes
Interpretation
Positive = profitable activity

-551 €

EBIT (2016) ?
EBIT (Operating Income)
Definition
Operating income, including depreciation and provisions.
Formula
EBITDA - Depreciation and provisions + Reversals

-555 €

Net income (2016) ?
Net income
Definition
Profit or loss after all expenses, including taxes and exceptional items.
Formula
Current income + Exceptional income - Income tax

-718 €

EBITDA margin (2016) ?
EBITDA margin
Definition
Measures the company's operating profitability.
Formula
(EBE / CA) x 100
Interpretation
> 10% : Good profitability
5-10% : Average
< 5% : Low

-1.0%

Loading income statement...

Chart evolution

Show :

Assets

Loading data...

Liabilities

Loading data...

Solvency and debt ratios

The debt ratio (= Financial debt / Equity x 100) stands at 49%. Debt remains under control: the company retains capacity to raise new debt if needed. Financial autonomy (= Equity / Total assets x 100) reaches 17%. Low autonomy: the company heavily depends on external financing (banks, suppliers).

Debt ratio (2016) ?
Debt ratio
Definition
Measures the proportion of debt to equity.
Formula
(Financial debt / Equity) x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Low
50-100% : Moderate
> 100% : High

49.194%

Financial autonomy (2016) ?
Financial autonomy
Definition
Share of equity in the company's total financing.
Formula
(Equity / Total assets) x 100
Interpretation
> 30% : Good autonomy
20-30% : Average
< 20% : Low

16.798%

Cash flow / Revenue (2016) ?
Cash flow / Revenue
Definition
Self-financing capacity relative to revenue.
Formula
(CAF / CA) x 100
Interpretation
The higher the ratio, the more cash the company generates

-1.258%

Repayment capacity (2016) ?
Repayment capacity
Definition
Number of years needed to repay debts with cash flow.
Formula
Financial debt / Cash flow
Interpretation
< 3 years : Excellent
3-5 years : Fair
> 5 years : Warning

-0.892

Asset age ratio (2016) ?
Asset age ratio
Definition
Measures the degree of wear of tangible assets.
Formula
Accumulated depreciation / Gross fixed assets x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Recent assets
50-70% : Normal wear
> 70% : Aging assets

91.8%

Solvency indicators evolution
NISSA RENOV

Sector positioning

Debt ratio
49.19 2016
2015
2016
Q1: 0.0
Med: 7.52
Q3: 43.71
Average

In 2016, the debt ratio of NISSA RENOV (49.19) ranks above the median of the sector. This ratio measures the weight of debt relative to equity. A reduction effort could improve financial strength.

Financial autonomy
16.8% 2016
2015
2016
Q1: 3.78%
Med: 21.76%
Q3: 44.82%
Average -32 pts over 2 years

In 2016, the financial autonomy of NISSA RENOV (16.8%) ranks below the median of the sector. This ratio represents the share of equity in total financing. An improvement would strengthen the competitive position.

Repayment capacity
-0.89 years 2016
2015
2016
Q1: 0.0 years
Med: 0.0 years
Q3: 0.59 years
Excellent -53 pts over 2 years

In 2016, the repayment capacity of NISSA RENOV (-0.89) ranks in the bottom 25% of the sector, which is positive. This ratio indicates the number of years needed to repay debt with cash flow. A short capacity reflects controlled debt and good cash generation.

Liquidity ratios

The liquidity ratio (= Current assets / Current liabilities) stands at 129.04. Concretely, the company has €2 of liquid assets for every €1 of short-term debt: no cash risk within 12 months.

Liquidity ratio (2016) ?
Liquidity ratio
Definition
Ability to meet short-term debts with current assets.
Formula
Current assets / Current liabilities
Interpretation
> 1.5 : Very good
1-1.5 : Fair
< 1 : Liquidity risk

129.038

Interest coverage (2016) ?
Interest coverage
Definition
Ability to cover interest charges with operating income.
Formula
EBIT / Interest expenses
Interpretation
> 3 : Comfortable
1.5-3 : Acceptable
< 1.5 : Risk

0.0

Liquidity indicators evolution
NISSA RENOV

Sector positioning

Liquidity ratio
129.04 2016
2015
2016
Q1: 116.95
Med: 162.41
Q3: 256.97
Average -45 pts over 2 years

In 2016, the liquidity ratio of NISSA RENOV (129.04) ranks below the median of the sector. This ratio measures the ability to cover short-term debt with current assets. An improvement would strengthen the competitive position.

Interest coverage
0.0x 2016
2015
2016
Q1: 0.0x
Med: 0.0x
Q3: 1.86x
Average

In 2016, the interest coverage of NISSA RENOV (0.0x) ranks below the median of the sector. This ratio indicates how many times operating income covers interest expenses. An improvement would strengthen the competitive position.

Working capital requirement (WCR) and payment terms

Working capital requirement (WCR) measures the cash timing gap between customer collections and supplier/inventory payments. Average customer payment term: 0 days (formula: Customer receivables / Revenue incl. VAT x 360). Supplier term: 8 days. Favorable situation: supplier credit is longer than customer credit by 8 days. Overall, WCR represents 3 days of revenue, i.e. 399 € to permanently finance.

Operating WCR (2016) ?
Operating WCR
Definition
Financing requirement generated by the operating cycle (inventory + receivables - trade payables).
Formula
Inventory + Customer receivables - Trade payables
Interpretation
Negative = cash released
Positive = financing needed

399 €

Customer credit (2016) ?
Customer credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term granted to customers.
Formula
(Customer receivables / Revenue incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
< 45j : Good
45-60j : Average
> 60j : Long

0 j

Supplier credit (2016) ?
Supplier credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term obtained from suppliers.
Formula
(Trade payables / Purchases incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
The longer the term, the better for cash flow

8 j

Inventory turnover (2016) ?
Inventory turnover (days)
Definition
Average storage duration for goods or materials.
Formula
(Inventory / Cost of goods) x 360
Interpretation
The lower the ratio, the faster the turnover

0 j

WCR in days of revenue (2016) ?
WCR in days of revenue
Definition
Expresses working capital requirement in days of revenue.
Formula
(Operating WCR / Revenue) x 360
Interpretation
The fewer days, the better the working capital management

3 j

WCR and payment terms evolution
NISSA RENOV

Positioning of NISSA RENOV in its sector

Comparison with sector Construction de maisons individuelles

Valuation estimate

Based on 113 transactions of similar company sales (all years), the value of NISSA RENOV is estimated at 6 288 € (range 4 376€ - 24 657€). The price/revenue ratio is 0.11x (conservative valuation). This multiples method compares the actual sale price of similar companies to their financial indicators (Revenue, EBITDA, Net Income). It provides a market-based indicative estimate.

Estimated enterprise value 2016
113 transactions
4k€ 6k€ 24k€
6 288 € Range: 4 376€ - 24 657€
NAF 5 all-time

Valuation method used

Revenue Multiple
57 153 € × 0.11x = 6 289 €
Range: 4 377€ - 24 658€

Only this financial indicator is available for this company.

How is this estimate calculated?

This estimate is based on the analysis of 113 actual transactions of similar company sales (same NAF code) registered with BODACC between 2016 and 2025.

  • EBITDA Multiple: Preferred method for profitable SMEs. EBITDA reflects the ability to generate cash.
  • Revenue Multiple: Used for growing companies or those with low profitability. Reflects commercial potential.
  • Net Income Multiple: Relevant for mature companies with stable results.

This estimate is provided for information purposes only. A precise valuation requires in-depth analysis (assets, liabilities, prospects, market...).

Similar companies (Construction de maisons individuelles)

Compare NISSA RENOV with other companies in the same sector:

Frequently asked questions about NISSA RENOV

What is the revenue of NISSA RENOV ?

The revenue of NISSA RENOV in 2016 is 57 k€.

Is NISSA RENOV profitable?

NISSA RENOV recorded a net loss in 2016.

Where is the headquarters of NISSA RENOV ?

The headquarters of NISSA RENOV is located in NICE (06200), in the department Alpes-Maritimes.

Where to find the tax return of NISSA RENOV ?

The tax return of NISSA RENOV is available on this page. Click on a year in the 'Data by year' section to view the account details (assets, liabilities, income statement). Data comes from INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property).

In which sector does NISSA RENOV operate?

NISSA RENOV operates in the sector Construction de maisons individuelles (NAF code 41.20A). See the 'Sector positioning' section above to compare the company with its competitors.