Les données financières de cette entreprise sont partiellement disponibles (liasse simplifiée ou données confidentielles). Certaines sections ne sont pas affichées.

NAKAMA-PROJECT : revenue, balance sheet and financial ratios

NAKAMA-PROJECT is a French company founded 12 years ago, specialized in the sector Location de terrains et d'autres biens immobiliers. Based in COLOMBES (92700), this company of category PME shows in 2016 a revenue of 7 k€. Find below the complete financial statements, solvency ratios, working capital requirements and sector comparison.

Data updated on 2026-04-11

Sources : INPI & INSEE SIRENE - Processing : Ministry of Economy

Financial history - NAKAMA-PROJECT (SIREN 795009083)
Indicator 2016
Revenue 6 585 €
Net income -8 293 €
EBITDA -1 314 €
Net margin -125.9%

Revenue and income statement

En 2016, NAKAMA-PROJECT alcanza unos ingresos de 7 k€. Tras deducir el consumo (0 €), el margen bruto se sitúa en 7 k€, es decir, una tasa del 100%. El EBITDA alcanza -1 k€, representando el -20.0% de los ingresos. Un EBITDA negativo significa que las operaciones no cubren los gastos corrientes. El resultado neto es negativo en -8 k€ (-125.9% de los ingresos).

Revenue (2016) ?
Revenue
Definition
Total amount of sales of goods and services made by the company.
Formula
Sales of goods + Sold production

6 585 €

Gross margin (2016) ?
Gross margin
Definition
Difference between revenue and cost of goods sold.
Formula
Revenue - Cost of goods consumed

6 585 €

EBITDA (2016) ?
Gross Operating Surplus (EBITDA)
Definition
Resources generated by current operations, before depreciation and financial expenses.
Formula
Value added - Personnel expenses - Taxes
Interpretation
Positive = profitable activity

-1 314 €

EBIT (2016) ?
EBIT (Operating Income)
Definition
Operating income, including depreciation and provisions.
Formula
EBITDA - Depreciation and provisions + Reversals

-6 225 €

Net income (2016) ?
Net income
Definition
Profit or loss after all expenses, including taxes and exceptional items.
Formula
Current income + Exceptional income - Income tax

-8 293 €

EBITDA margin (2016) ?
EBITDA margin
Definition
Measures the company's operating profitability.
Formula
(EBE / CA) x 100
Interpretation
> 10% : Good profitability
5-10% : Average
< 5% : Low

-20.0%

Loading income statement...

Chart evolution

Show :

Assets

Loading data...

Liabilities

Loading data...

Solvency and debt ratios

El ratio de endeudamiento (= Deuda financiera / Fondos propios x 100) se sitúa en -200%. Este nivel muy bajo refleja una estructura financiera sólida. La autonomía financiera (= Fondos propios / Total activo x 100) alcanza el -69%. Baja autonomía: la empresa depende fuertemente de financiación externa.

Debt ratio (2016) ?
Debt ratio
Definition
Measures the proportion of debt to equity.
Formula
(Financial debt / Equity) x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Low
50-100% : Moderate
> 100% : High

-199.962%

Financial autonomy (2016) ?
Financial autonomy
Definition
Share of equity in the company's total financing.
Formula
(Equity / Total assets) x 100
Interpretation
> 30% : Good autonomy
20-30% : Average
< 20% : Low

-69.019%

Cash flow / Revenue (2016) ?
Cash flow / Revenue
Definition
Self-financing capacity relative to revenue.
Formula
(CAF / CA) x 100
Interpretation
The higher the ratio, the more cash the company generates

-51.344%

Repayment capacity (2016) ?
Repayment capacity
Definition
Number of years needed to repay debts with cash flow.
Formula
Financial debt / Cash flow
Interpretation
< 3 years : Excellent
3-5 years : Fair
> 5 years : Warning

-24.583

Asset age ratio (2016) ?
Asset age ratio
Definition
Measures the degree of wear of tangible assets.
Formula
Accumulated depreciation / Gross fixed assets x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Recent assets
50-70% : Normal wear
> 70% : Aging assets

73.0%

Solvency indicators evolution
NAKAMA-PROJECT

Sector positioning

Ratio de endeudamiento
-199.96 2016
2016
Q1: 0.0
Med: 11.0
Q3: 142.28
Excelente

En 2016, el ratio de endeudamiento de NAKAMA-PROJECT (-199.96) se sitúa en el 25% más bajo del sector, lo cual es positivo. Este ratio mide el peso de la deuda en relación con el patrimonio. Un ratio bajo indica una estructura financiera sólida con poca dependencia de los acreedores.

Autonomía financiera
-69.02% 2016
2016
Q1: 2.59%
Med: 36.76%
Q3: 77.28%
Average

En 2016, el autonomía financiera de NAKAMA-PROJECT (-69.0%) se sitúa por debajo de la mediana del sector. Este ratio representa la parte del patrimonio en la financiación total. Una mejora fortalecería la posición competitiva.

Capacidad de reembolso
-24.58 ans 2016
2016
Q1: 0.0 ans
Med: 0.4 ans
Q3: 7.36 ans
Excelente

En 2016, el capacidad de reembolso de NAKAMA-PROJECT (-24.6 an) se sitúa en el 25% más bajo del sector, lo cual es positivo. Este ratio indica el número de años necesarios para pagar la deuda con flujo de caja. Una capacidad corta refleja deuda controlada y buena generación de efectivo.

Liquidity ratios

El ratio de liquidez se sitúa en 9.04. La empresa tiene 2€ de activos líquidos por cada 1€ de deuda a corto plazo.

Liquidity ratio (2016) ?
Liquidity ratio
Definition
Ability to meet short-term debts with current assets.
Formula
Current assets / Current liabilities
Interpretation
> 1.5 : Very good
1-1.5 : Fair
< 1 : Liquidity risk

9.045

Interest coverage (2016) ?
Interest coverage
Definition
Ability to cover interest charges with operating income.
Formula
EBIT / Interest expenses
Interpretation
> 3 : Comfortable
1.5-3 : Acceptable
< 1.5 : Risk

-157.306

Liquidity indicators evolution
NAKAMA-PROJECT

Sector positioning

Ratio de liquidez
9.04 2016
2016
Q1: 71.33
Med: 221.7
Q3: 837.13
Average

En 2016, el ratio de liquidez de NAKAMA-PROJECT (9.04) se sitúa por debajo de la mediana del sector. Este ratio mide la capacidad de cubrir deuda a corto plazo con activos corrientes. Una mejora fortalecería la posición competitiva.

Cobertura de intereses
-157.31x 2016
2016
Q1: 0.0x
Med: 0.1x
Q3: 17.18x
Average

En 2016, el cobertura de intereses de NAKAMA-PROJECT (-157.3x) se sitúa por debajo de la mediana del sector. Este ratio indica cuántas veces el resultado operativo cubre los gastos de intereses. Una mejora fortalecería la posición competitiva.

Working capital requirement (WCR) and payment terms

El fondo de maniobra operativo (FM) mide el desfase temporal de tesorería. Plazo medio de cobro a clientes: 39 días. Plazo proveedores: 42 días. Situación favorable. El FM es negativo (-885 días): las operaciones generan estructuralmente tesorería.

Operating WCR (2016) ?
Operating WCR
Definition
Financing requirement generated by the operating cycle (inventory + receivables - trade payables).
Formula
Inventory + Customer receivables - Trade payables
Interpretation
Negative = cash released
Positive = financing needed

-16 196 €

Customer credit (2016) ?
Customer credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term granted to customers.
Formula
(Customer receivables / Revenue incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
< 45j : Good
45-60j : Average
> 60j : Long

39 j

Supplier credit (2016) ?
Supplier credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term obtained from suppliers.
Formula
(Trade payables / Purchases incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
The longer the term, the better for cash flow

42 j

Inventory turnover (2016) ?
Inventory turnover (days)
Definition
Average storage duration for goods or materials.
Formula
(Inventory / Cost of goods) x 360
Interpretation
The lower the ratio, the faster the turnover

0 j

WCR in days of revenue (2016) ?
WCR in days of revenue
Definition
Expresses working capital requirement in days of revenue.
Formula
(Operating WCR / Revenue) x 360
Interpretation
The fewer days, the better the working capital management

-885 j

WCR and payment terms evolution
NAKAMA-PROJECT

Positioning of NAKAMA-PROJECT in its sector

Comparison with sector Location de terrains et d'autres biens immobiliers

Valuation estimate

Based on 1762 transactions of similar company sales (all years), the value of NAKAMA-PROJECT is estimated at 4 287 € (range 1 772€ - 10 612€). The price/revenue ratio is 0.65x (in line with sector norms). This multiples method compares the actual sale price of similar companies to their financial indicators (Revenue, EBITDA, Net Income). It provides a market-based indicative estimate.

Estimated enterprise value 2016
1762 transactions
1k€ 4k€ 10k€
4 287 € Range: 1 772€ - 10 612€
NAF 5 all-time

Valuation method used

Revenue Multiple
6 585 € × 0.65x = 4 287 €
Range: 1 773€ - 10 613€

Only this financial indicator is available for this company.

How is this estimate calculated?

This estimate is based on the analysis of 1762 actual transactions of similar company sales (same NAF code) registered with BODACC between 2016 and 2025.

  • EBITDA Multiple: Preferred method for profitable SMEs. EBITDA reflects the ability to generate cash.
  • Revenue Multiple: Used for growing companies or those with low profitability. Reflects commercial potential.
  • Net Income Multiple: Relevant for mature companies with stable results.

This estimate is provided for information purposes only. A precise valuation requires in-depth analysis (assets, liabilities, prospects, market...).

Similar companies (Location de terrains et d'autres biens immobiliers)

Compare NAKAMA-PROJECT with other companies in the same sector:

Frequently asked questions about NAKAMA-PROJECT

What is the revenue of NAKAMA-PROJECT ?

The revenue of NAKAMA-PROJECT in 2016 is 7 k€.

Is NAKAMA-PROJECT profitable?

NAKAMA-PROJECT recorded a net loss in 2016.

Where is the headquarters of NAKAMA-PROJECT ?

The headquarters of NAKAMA-PROJECT is located in COLOMBES (92700), in the department Hauts-de-Seine.

Where to find the tax return of NAKAMA-PROJECT ?

The tax return of NAKAMA-PROJECT is available on this page. Click on a year in the 'Data by year' section to view the account details (assets, liabilities, income statement). Data comes from INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property).

In which sector does NAKAMA-PROJECT operate?

NAKAMA-PROJECT operates in the sector Location de terrains et d'autres biens immobiliers (NAF code 68.20B). See the 'Sector positioning' section above to compare the company with its competitors.