JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO : revenue, balance sheet and financial ratios

JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO is a French company founded 44 years ago, specialized in the sector Autres services d'information n.c.a.. Based in PARIS (75008), this company of category PME shows in 2017 a revenue of 658 k€. Find below the complete financial statements, solvency ratios, working capital requirements and sector comparison.

Data updated on 2026-05-02

Sources : INPI & INSEE SIRENE - Processing : Ministry of Economy

Financial history - JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO (SIREN 323117663)
Indicator 2017 2016
Revenue 657 582 € 688 940 €
Net income 49 943 € 124 892 €
EBITDA 67 882 € 141 788 €
Net margin 7.6% 18.1%

Revenue and income statement

In 2017, JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO achieves revenue of 658 k€. Slight decline of -5% vs 2016. After deducting consumption (68 k€), gross margin stands at 589 k€, i.e. a rate of 90%. This ratio measures the ability to generate value from commercial activity. EBITDA (= Gross margin - Personnel expenses - Taxes) reaches 68 k€, representing 10.3% of revenue. Warning negative scissor effect: despite revenue change (-5%), EBITDA varies by -52%, reducing margin by 10.3 pts. This reflects costs rising faster than revenue. This level of operating margin is satisfactory for the sector. Ultimately, net income (= EBIT +/- financial result +/- exceptional - corporate tax) amounts to 50 k€, i.e. 7.6% of revenue. This profit can be retained or distributed to shareholders.

Revenue (2017) ?
Revenue
Definition
Total amount of sales of goods and services made by the company.
Formula
Sales of goods + Sold production

657 582 €

Gross margin (2017) ?
Gross margin
Definition
Difference between revenue and cost of goods sold.
Formula
Revenue - Cost of goods consumed

589 405 €

EBITDA (2017) ?
Gross Operating Surplus (EBITDA)
Definition
Resources generated by current operations, before depreciation and financial expenses.
Formula
Value added - Personnel expenses - Taxes
Interpretation
Positive = profitable activity

67 882 €

EBIT (2017) ?
EBIT (Operating Income)
Definition
Operating income, including depreciation and provisions.
Formula
EBITDA - Depreciation and provisions + Reversals

63 139 €

Net income (2017) ?
Net income
Definition
Profit or loss after all expenses, including taxes and exceptional items.
Formula
Current income + Exceptional income - Income tax

49 943 €

EBITDA margin (2017) ?
EBITDA margin
Definition
Measures the company's operating profitability.
Formula
(EBE / CA) x 100
Interpretation
> 10% : Good profitability
5-10% : Average
< 5% : Low

10.3%

Loading income statement...

Chart evolution

Show :

Assets

Loading data...

Liabilities

Loading data...

Solvency and debt ratios

The debt ratio (= Financial debt / Equity x 100) stands at 227%. Critical situation: debt significantly exceeds equity, severely limiting borrowing capacity and exposing the company to default risk. Financial autonomy (= Equity / Total assets x 100) reaches 27%. The balance between equity and debt is satisfactory. Debt repayment capacity (= Financial debt / Cash flow) indicates it would take 5.8 years of cash flow to repay all financial debt. This ratio remains within usual banking standards. Cash flow represents 7.9% of revenue. Cash flow measures resources generated by operations, available for investment and debt repayment. Satisfactory level allowing partial financing of growth.

Debt ratio (2017) ?
Debt ratio
Definition
Measures the proportion of debt to equity.
Formula
(Financial debt / Equity) x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Low
50-100% : Moderate
> 100% : High

226.513%

Financial autonomy (2017) ?
Financial autonomy
Definition
Share of equity in the company's total financing.
Formula
(Equity / Total assets) x 100
Interpretation
> 30% : Good autonomy
20-30% : Average
< 20% : Low

26.952%

Cash flow / Revenue (2017) ?
Cash flow / Revenue
Definition
Self-financing capacity relative to revenue.
Formula
(CAF / CA) x 100
Interpretation
The higher the ratio, the more cash the company generates

7.851%

Repayment capacity (2017) ?
Repayment capacity
Definition
Number of years needed to repay debts with cash flow.
Formula
Financial debt / Cash flow
Interpretation
< 3 years : Excellent
3-5 years : Fair
> 5 years : Warning

5.752

Asset age ratio (2017) ?
Asset age ratio
Definition
Measures the degree of wear of tangible assets.
Formula
Accumulated depreciation / Gross fixed assets x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Recent assets
50-70% : Normal wear
> 70% : Aging assets

8.9%

Solvency indicators evolution
JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO

Sector positioning

Debt ratio
226.51 2017
2016
2017
Q1: 0.0
Med: 2.18
Q3: 28.52
Average +50 pts over 2 years

In 2017, the debt ratio of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO (226.51) ranks above the median of the sector. This ratio measures the weight of debt relative to equity. A reduction effort could improve financial strength.

Financial autonomy
26.95% 2017
2016
2017
Q1: 4.43%
Med: 32.26%
Q3: 72.16%
Average +7 pts over 2 years

In 2017, the financial autonomy of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO (26.9%) ranks below the median of the sector. This ratio represents the share of equity in total financing. An improvement would strengthen the competitive position.

Repayment capacity
5.75 years 2017
2016
2017
Q1: 0.0 years
Med: 0.0 years
Q3: 0.05 years
Watch +57 pts over 2 years

In 2017, the repayment capacity of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO (5.75) ranks in the top 25% of the sector. This ratio indicates the number of years needed to repay debt with cash flow. A long duration may signal heavy debt relative to repayment capacity.

Liquidity ratios

The liquidity ratio (= Current assets / Current liabilities) stands at 449.46. Concretely, the company has €2 of liquid assets for every €1 of short-term debt: no cash risk within 12 months. The interest coverage ratio (= EBIT / Interest expenses) is 18.4x. Operating income very largely covers interest expenses: high safety margin.

Liquidity ratio (2017) ?
Liquidity ratio
Definition
Ability to meet short-term debts with current assets.
Formula
Current assets / Current liabilities
Interpretation
> 1.5 : Very good
1-1.5 : Fair
< 1 : Liquidity risk

449.465

Interest coverage (2017) ?
Interest coverage
Definition
Ability to cover interest charges with operating income.
Formula
EBIT / Interest expenses
Interpretation
> 3 : Comfortable
1.5-3 : Acceptable
< 1.5 : Risk

18.429

Liquidity indicators evolution
JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO

Sector positioning

Liquidity ratio
449.46 2017
2016
2017
Q1: 119.43
Med: 247.1
Q3: 532.21
Good -7 pts over 2 years

In 2017, the liquidity ratio of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO (449.46) ranks above the median of the sector. This ratio measures the ability to cover short-term debt with current assets. This comfortable position offers an appreciable safety margin.

Interest coverage
18.43x 2017
2016
2017
Q1: 0.0x
Med: 0.0x
Q3: 0.13x
Excellent

In 2017, the interest coverage of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO (18.4x) ranks in the top 25% of the sector. This ratio indicates how many times operating income covers interest expenses. High coverage means financial charges weigh little on profitability.

Working capital requirement (WCR) and payment terms

Working capital requirement (WCR) measures the cash timing gap between customer collections and supplier/inventory payments. Average customer payment term: 0 days (formula: Customer receivables / Revenue incl. VAT x 360). Supplier term: 5 days. Favorable situation: supplier credit is longer than customer credit by 5 days. Inventory turnover is 46 days (= Average inventory / Cost of goods x 360). Overall, WCR represents 14 days of revenue, i.e. 26 k€ to permanently finance.

Operating WCR (2017) ?
Operating WCR
Definition
Financing requirement generated by the operating cycle (inventory + receivables - trade payables).
Formula
Inventory + Customer receivables - Trade payables
Interpretation
Negative = cash released
Positive = financing needed

26 422 €

Customer credit (2017) ?
Customer credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term granted to customers.
Formula
(Customer receivables / Revenue incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
< 45j : Good
45-60j : Average
> 60j : Long

0 j

Supplier credit (2017) ?
Supplier credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term obtained from suppliers.
Formula
(Trade payables / Purchases incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
The longer the term, the better for cash flow

5 j

Inventory turnover (2017) ?
Inventory turnover (days)
Definition
Average storage duration for goods or materials.
Formula
(Inventory / Cost of goods) x 360
Interpretation
The lower the ratio, the faster the turnover

46 j

WCR in days of revenue (2017) ?
WCR in days of revenue
Definition
Expresses working capital requirement in days of revenue.
Formula
(Operating WCR / Revenue) x 360
Interpretation
The fewer days, the better the working capital management

14 j

WCR and payment terms evolution
JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO

Positioning of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO in its sector

Comparison with sector Autres services d'information n.c.a.

Similar companies (Autres services d'information n.c.a.)

Compare JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO with other companies in the same sector:

Frequently asked questions about JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO

What is the revenue of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO ?

The revenue of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO in 2017 is 658 k€.

Is JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO profitable?

Yes, JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO generated a net profit of 50 k€ in 2017.

Where is the headquarters of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO ?

The headquarters of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO is located in PARIS (75008), in the department Paris.

Where to find the tax return of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO ?

The tax return of JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO is available on this page. Click on a year in the 'Data by year' section to view the account details (assets, liabilities, income statement). Data comes from INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property).

In which sector does JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO operate?

JUNKO SHIMADA DESIGN STUDIO operates in the sector Autres services d'information n.c.a. (NAF code 63.99Z). See the 'Sector positioning' section above to compare the company with its competitors.