Les données financières de cette entreprise sont partiellement disponibles (liasse simplifiée ou données confidentielles). Certaines sections ne sont pas affichées.
JUNG LOGISTIQUE : revenue, balance sheet and financial ratios
JUNG LOGISTIQUE is a French company
founded 18 years ago,
specialized in the sector Activités des sièges sociaux.
Based in SELESTAT (67600),
this company of category ETI
shows in 2016 a revenue of 1.1 M€.
Find below the complete financial statements, solvency ratios, working capital requirements and sector comparison.
Financial history - JUNG LOGISTIQUE (SIREN 501092472)
Indicator
2016
Revenue
1 120 972 €
Net income
24 084 €
EBITDA
28 288 €
Net margin
2.1%
Revenue and income statement
In 2016, JUNG LOGISTIQUE achieves revenue of 1.1 M€. After deducting consumption (0 €), gross margin stands at 1.1 M€, i.e. a rate of 100%. This ratio measures the ability to generate value from commercial activity. EBITDA (= Gross margin - Personnel expenses - Taxes) reaches 28 k€, representing 2.5% of revenue. The operating margin remains fragile, requiring cost vigilance. Ultimately, net income (= EBIT +/- financial result +/- exceptional - corporate tax) amounts to 24 k€, i.e. 2.1% of revenue. This profit can be retained or distributed to shareholders.
Revenue (2016)
?
Revenue
Definition
Total amount of sales of goods and services made by the company.
Formula
Sales of goods + Sold production
1 120 972 €
Gross margin (2016)
?
Gross margin
Definition
Difference between revenue and cost of goods sold.
Formula
Revenue - Cost of goods consumed
1 120 972 €
EBITDA (2016)
?
Gross Operating Surplus (EBITDA)
Definition
Resources generated by current operations, before depreciation and financial expenses.
Formula
Value added - Personnel expenses - Taxes
Interpretation
Positive = profitable activity
28 288 €
EBIT (2016)
?
EBIT (Operating Income)
Definition
Operating income, including depreciation and provisions.
Formula
EBITDA - Depreciation and provisions + Reversals
-36 958 €
Net income (2016)
?
Net income
Definition
Profit or loss after all expenses, including taxes and exceptional items.
Formula
Current income + Exceptional income - Income tax
24 084 €
EBITDA margin (2016)
?
EBITDA margin
Definition
Measures the company's operating profitability.
Formula
(EBE / CA) x 100
Interpretation
> 10% : Good profitability 5-10% : Average < 5% : Low
2.5%
Loading income statement...
Income statement
Item
Amount
% Revenue
Change
The detailed income statement is not available for this company (simplified accounts or confidential data).
Chart evolution
Show :
Visualization created via numbers.finance Sources : INPI & BCE - Adjustments : Ministry of Economy
Assets
Loading data...
Item
Gross
Deprec.
Net
%
Change
Assets balance sheet data not available for this company
Liabilities
Loading data...
Item
Year
%
Change
Liabilities balance sheet data not available for this company
Solvency and debt ratios
The debt ratio (= Financial debt / Equity x 100) stands at 0%. This very low level reflects a solid financial structure, offering significant room for future investments or acquisitions. Financial autonomy (= Equity / Total assets x 100) reaches 82%. This high autonomy means the company finances most of its assets through equity, a sign of strength. Debt repayment capacity (= Financial debt / Cash flow) indicates it would take 0.0 years of cash flow to repay all financial debt. This short period demonstrates excellent debt sustainability. Cash flow represents 8.2% of revenue. Cash flow measures resources generated by operations, available for investment and debt repayment. Satisfactory level allowing partial financing of growth.
Debt ratio (2016)
?
Debt ratio
Definition
Measures the proportion of debt to equity.
Formula
(Financial debt / Equity) x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Low 50-100% : Moderate > 100% : High
0.012%
Financial autonomy (2016)
?
Financial autonomy
Definition
Share of equity in the company's total financing.
Formula
(Equity / Total assets) x 100
Interpretation
> 30% : Good autonomy 20-30% : Average < 20% : Low
81.51%
Cash flow / Revenue (2016)
?
Cash flow / Revenue
Definition
Self-financing capacity relative to revenue.
Formula
(CAF / CA) x 100
Interpretation
The higher the ratio, the more cash the company generates
8.166%
Repayment capacity (2016)
?
Repayment capacity
Definition
Number of years needed to repay debts with cash flow.
Formula
Financial debt / Cash flow
Interpretation
< 3 years : Excellent 3-5 years : Fair > 5 years : Warning
0.002
Asset age ratio (2016)
?
Asset age ratio
Definition
Measures the degree of wear of tangible assets.
Formula
Accumulated depreciation / Gross fixed assets x 100
Visualization created via numbers.finance Sources : INPI & BCE - Adjustments : Ministry of Economy
Indicator
2016
Debt ratio
0.012
Financial autonomy
81.51
Repayment capacity
0.002
Cash flow / Revenue
8.166%
Sector positioning
Debt ratio
0.012016
2016
Q1: 0.23
Med: 22.82
Q3: 100.5
Excellent
In 2016, the debt ratio of JUNG LOGISTIQUE (0.01) ranks in the bottom 25% of the sector, which is positive. This ratio measures the weight of debt relative to equity. A low ratio indicates a solid financial structure with little dependence on creditors.
Financial autonomy
81.51%2016
2016
Q1: 19.78%
Med: 51.31%
Q3: 80.56%
Excellent
In 2016, the financial autonomy of JUNG LOGISTIQUE (81.5%) ranks in the top 25% of the sector. This ratio represents the share of equity in total financing. High autonomy reflects financial independence and ability to absorb shocks.
Repayment capacity
0.0 years2016
2016
Q1: 0.0 years
Med: 0.42 years
Q3: 4.83 years
Good
In 2016, the repayment capacity of JUNG LOGISTIQUE (0.00) ranks below the median of the sector. This ratio indicates the number of years needed to repay debt with cash flow. This controlled position reflects prudent management.
Liquidity ratios
The liquidity ratio (= Current assets / Current liabilities) stands at 336.77. Concretely, the company has €2 of liquid assets for every €1 of short-term debt: no cash risk within 12 months. The interest coverage ratio (= EBIT / Interest expenses) is 0.0x. Danger: operating income does not cover interest charges, unsustainable situation.
Liquidity ratio (2016)
?
Liquidity ratio
Definition
Ability to meet short-term debts with current assets.
Formula
Current assets / Current liabilities
Interpretation
> 1.5 : Very good 1-1.5 : Fair < 1 : Liquidity risk
336.773
Interest coverage (2016)
?
Interest coverage
Definition
Ability to cover interest charges with operating income.
Formula
EBIT / Interest expenses
Interpretation
> 3 : Comfortable 1.5-3 : Acceptable < 1.5 : Risk
0.046
Liquidity indicators evolution JUNG LOGISTIQUE
Visualisation créée via abddaf.fr Sources : INPI & BCE - Retraitements : Ministère de l'économie
Indicator
2016
Liquidity ratio
336.773
Interest coverage
0.046
Sector positioning
Liquidity ratio
336.772016
2016
Q1: 94.71
Med: 264.63
Q3: 1055.91
Good
In 2016, the liquidity ratio of JUNG LOGISTIQUE (336.77) ranks above the median of the sector. This ratio measures the ability to cover short-term debt with current assets. This comfortable position offers an appreciable safety margin.
Interest coverage
0.05x2016
2016
Q1: -28.1x
Med: 0.0x
Q3: 6.36x
Good
In 2016, the interest coverage of JUNG LOGISTIQUE (0.1x) ranks above the median of the sector. This ratio indicates how many times operating income covers interest expenses. This comfortable position offers an appreciable safety margin.
Working capital requirement (WCR) and payment terms
Working capital requirement (WCR) measures the cash timing gap between customer collections and supplier/inventory payments. Average customer payment term: 136 days (formula: Customer receivables / Revenue incl. VAT x 360). Supplier term: 103 days. The gap of 33 days means the company finances its customers for over a month before being paid relative to supplier payments. This weighs on cash flow. Overall, WCR represents 118 days of revenue, i.e. 369 k€ to permanently finance.
Operating WCR (2016)
?
Operating WCR
Definition
Financing requirement generated by the operating cycle (inventory + receivables - trade payables).
Formula
Inventory + Customer receivables - Trade payables
Interpretation
Negative = cash released Positive = financing needed
368 620 €
Customer credit (2016)
?
Customer credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term granted to customers.
Formula
(Customer receivables / Revenue incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
< 45j : Good 45-60j : Average > 60j : Long
136 j
Supplier credit (2016)
?
Supplier credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term obtained from suppliers.
Formula
(Trade payables / Purchases incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
The longer the term, the better for cash flow
103 j
Inventory turnover (2016)
?
Inventory turnover (days)
Definition
Average storage duration for goods or materials.
Formula
(Inventory / Cost of goods) x 360
Interpretation
The lower the ratio, the faster the turnover
0 j
WCR in days of revenue (2016)
?
WCR in days of revenue
Definition
Expresses working capital requirement in days of revenue.
Formula
(Operating WCR / Revenue) x 360
Interpretation
The fewer days, the better the working capital management
118 j
WCR and payment terms evolution JUNG LOGISTIQUE
Visualization created via numbers.finance Sources : INPI & BCE - Adjustments : Ministry of Economy
Indicator
2016
Operating WCR
368 620 €
Inventory turnover (days)
0
Customer payment term (days)
136
Supplier payment term (days)
103
Positioning of JUNG LOGISTIQUE in its sector
Comparison with sector Activités des sièges sociaux
Valuation estimate
Based on 808 transactions of similar company sales
(all years),
the value of JUNG LOGISTIQUE is estimated at
236 372 €
(range 99 398€ - 447 245€).
With an EBITDA of 28 288€, the sector multiple of 4.6x is applied.
The price/revenue ratio is 0.42x
(conservative valuation).
This multiples method compares the actual sale price of similar companies to their financial indicators (Revenue, EBITDA, Net Income). It provides a market-based indicative estimate.
Estimated enterprise value2016
808 transactions
99k€236k€447k€
236 372 €Range: 99 398€ - 447 245€
NAF 5 all-time
Valuation detail by method
Ajustez les pondérations selon votre analyse
EBITDA Multiple50%
28 288 €×4.6x
Estimation131 213 €
55 363€ - 228 059€
Revenue Multiple30%
1 120 972 €×0.42x
Estimation471 255 €
201 757€ - 896 334€
Net Income Multiple20%
24 084 €×6.1x
Estimation146 948 €
55 951€ - 321 581€
How is this estimate calculated?
This estimate is based on the analysis of 808 actual transactions of similar company sales (same NAF code) registered with BODACC between 2016 and 2025.
EBITDA Multiple: Preferred method for profitable SMEs. EBITDA reflects the ability to generate cash.
Revenue Multiple: Used for growing companies or those with low profitability. Reflects commercial potential.
Net Income Multiple: Relevant for mature companies with stable results.
This estimate is provided for information purposes only. A precise valuation requires in-depth analysis (assets, liabilities, prospects, market...).
Similar companies (Activités des sièges sociaux)
Compare JUNG LOGISTIQUE with other companies in the same sector:
Yes, JUNG LOGISTIQUE generated a net profit of 24 k€ in 2016.
Where is the headquarters of JUNG LOGISTIQUE ?
The headquarters of JUNG LOGISTIQUE is located in SELESTAT (67600), in the department Bas-Rhin.
Where to find the tax return of JUNG LOGISTIQUE ?
The tax return of JUNG LOGISTIQUE is available on this page. Click on a year in the 'Data by year' section to view the account details (assets, liabilities, income statement). Data comes from INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property).
In which sector does JUNG LOGISTIQUE operate?
JUNG LOGISTIQUE operates in the sector Activités des sièges sociaux (NAF code 70.10Z). See the 'Sector positioning' section above to compare the company with its competitors.
Item evolution
Rotate your phone to landscape mode to view the chart