IPEB : revenue, balance sheet and financial ratios

IPEB is a French company founded 11 years ago, specialized in the sector Construction d'autres bâtiments. Based in VAIRES-SUR-MARNE (77360), this company of category PME shows in 2017 a revenue of 555 k€. Find below the complete financial statements, solvency ratios, working capital requirements and sector comparison.

Data updated on 2026-05-02

Sources : INPI & INSEE SIRENE - Processing : Ministry of Economy

Financial history - IPEB (SIREN 810841155)
Indicator 2017 2016 2015
Revenue 555 002 € 545 642 € 555 687 €
Net income 49 321 € 3 745 € 20 761 €
EBITDA 83 140 € 30 033 € 38 081 €
Net margin 8.9% 0.7% 3.7%

Revenue and income statement

En 2017, IPEB alcanza unos ingresos de 555 k€. La actividad permanece estable durante el período (TCAC: -0.1%). Vs 2016: +2%. Tras deducir el consumo (174 k€), el margen bruto se sitúa en 381 k€, es decir, una tasa del 69%. El EBITDA alcanza 83 k€, representando el 15.0% de los ingresos. Efecto tijera positivo: el margen EBITDA mejora en +9.5 puntos. Este nivel de margen operativo es satisfactorio para el sector. El resultado neto asciende a 49 k€, es decir, el 8.9% de los ingresos.

Revenue (2017) ?
Revenue
Definition
Total amount of sales of goods and services made by the company.
Formula
Sales of goods + Sold production

555 002 €

Gross margin (2017) ?
Gross margin
Definition
Difference between revenue and cost of goods sold.
Formula
Revenue - Cost of goods consumed

380 594 €

EBITDA (2017) ?
Gross Operating Surplus (EBITDA)
Definition
Resources generated by current operations, before depreciation and financial expenses.
Formula
Value added - Personnel expenses - Taxes
Interpretation
Positive = profitable activity

83 140 €

EBIT (2017) ?
EBIT (Operating Income)
Definition
Operating income, including depreciation and provisions.
Formula
EBITDA - Depreciation and provisions + Reversals

62 002 €

Net income (2017) ?
Net income
Definition
Profit or loss after all expenses, including taxes and exceptional items.
Formula
Current income + Exceptional income - Income tax

49 321 €

EBITDA margin (2017) ?
EBITDA margin
Definition
Measures the company's operating profitability.
Formula
(EBE / CA) x 100
Interpretation
> 10% : Good profitability
5-10% : Average
< 5% : Low

15.0%

Loading income statement...

Chart evolution

Show :

Assets

Loading data...

Liabilities

Loading data...

Solvency and debt ratios

El ratio de endeudamiento (= Deuda financiera / Fondos propios x 100) se sitúa en 32%. La deuda permanece bajo control. La autonomía financiera (= Fondos propios / Total activo x 100) alcanza el 27%. El equilibrio entre fondos propios y deuda es satisfactorio. La capacidad de reembolso indica que se necesitarían 0.4 años de flujo de caja. Este corto período demuestra una excelente sostenibilidad de la deuda. El flujo de caja representa el 12.1% de los ingresos. Este alto nivel proporciona una fuerte capacidad de autofinanciación.

Debt ratio (2017) ?
Debt ratio
Definition
Measures the proportion of debt to equity.
Formula
(Financial debt / Equity) x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Low
50-100% : Moderate
> 100% : High

32.407%

Financial autonomy (2017) ?
Financial autonomy
Definition
Share of equity in the company's total financing.
Formula
(Equity / Total assets) x 100
Interpretation
> 30% : Good autonomy
20-30% : Average
< 20% : Low

27.114%

Cash flow / Revenue (2017) ?
Cash flow / Revenue
Definition
Self-financing capacity relative to revenue.
Formula
(CAF / CA) x 100
Interpretation
The higher the ratio, the more cash the company generates

12.086%

Repayment capacity (2017) ?
Repayment capacity
Definition
Number of years needed to repay debts with cash flow.
Formula
Financial debt / Cash flow
Interpretation
< 3 years : Excellent
3-5 years : Fair
> 5 years : Warning

0.366

Asset age ratio (2017) ?
Asset age ratio
Definition
Measures the degree of wear of tangible assets.
Formula
Accumulated depreciation / Gross fixed assets x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Recent assets
50-70% : Normal wear
> 70% : Aging assets

21.8%

Solvency indicators evolution
IPEB

Sector positioning

Ratio de endeudamiento
32.41 2017
2015
2016
2017
Q1: 0.01
Med: 8.7
Q3: 49.12
Average -8 pts over 3 years

En 2017, el ratio de endeudamiento de IPEB (32.41) se sitúa por encima de la mediana del sector. Este ratio mide el peso de la deuda en relación con el patrimonio. Un esfuerzo de reducción podría mejorar la solidez financiera.

Autonomía financiera
27.11% 2017
2015
2016
2017
Q1: 4.02%
Med: 21.26%
Q3: 44.34%
Bueno +16 pts over 3 years

En 2017, el autonomía financiera de IPEB (27.1%) se sitúa por encima de la mediana del sector. Este ratio representa la parte del patrimonio en la financiación total. Esta posición cómoda ofrece un margen de seguridad apreciable.

Capacidad de reembolso
0.37 ans 2017
2015
2016
2017
Q1: 0.0 ans
Med: 0.01 ans
Q3: 0.87 ans
Average -8 pts over 3 years

En 2017, el capacidad de reembolso de IPEB (0.4 an) se sitúa por encima de la mediana del sector. Este ratio indica el número de años necesarios para pagar la deuda con flujo de caja. Un esfuerzo de reducción podría mejorar la solidez financiera.

Liquidity ratios

El ratio de liquidez se sitúa en 154.29. La empresa tiene 2€ de activos líquidos por cada 1€ de deuda a corto plazo. El ratio de cobertura de intereses (= EBIT / Gastos financieros) es de 1.0x. La cobertura es limitada.

Liquidity ratio (2017) ?
Liquidity ratio
Definition
Ability to meet short-term debts with current assets.
Formula
Current assets / Current liabilities
Interpretation
> 1.5 : Very good
1-1.5 : Fair
< 1 : Liquidity risk

154.286

Interest coverage (2017) ?
Interest coverage
Definition
Ability to cover interest charges with operating income.
Formula
EBIT / Interest expenses
Interpretation
> 3 : Comfortable
1.5-3 : Acceptable
< 1.5 : Risk

1.04

Liquidity indicators evolution
IPEB

Sector positioning

Ratio de liquidez
154.29 2017
2015
2016
2017
Q1: 118.56
Med: 160.08
Q3: 247.36
Average +10 pts over 3 years

En 2017, el ratio de liquidez de IPEB (154.29) se sitúa por debajo de la mediana del sector. Este ratio mide la capacidad de cubrir deuda a corto plazo con activos corrientes. Una mejora fortalecería la posición competitiva.

Cobertura de intereses
1.04x 2017
2015
2016
2017
Q1: 0.0x
Med: 0.01x
Q3: 2.35x
Bueno +36 pts over 3 years

En 2017, el cobertura de intereses de IPEB (1.0x) se sitúa por encima de la mediana del sector. Este ratio indica cuántas veces el resultado operativo cubre los gastos de intereses. Esta posición cómoda ofrece un margen de seguridad apreciable.

Working capital requirement (WCR) and payment terms

El fondo de maniobra operativo (FM) mide el desfase temporal de tesorería. Plazo medio de cobro a clientes: 70 días. Plazo proveedores: 61 días. La empresa debe financiar 9 días de desfase. La rotación de existencias es de 8 días. Rotación rápida, señal de buena gestión de existencias. El FM representa 52 días de ingresos. En 2015-2017, el FM aumentó en +385%.

Operating WCR (2017) ?
Operating WCR
Definition
Financing requirement generated by the operating cycle (inventory + receivables - trade payables).
Formula
Inventory + Customer receivables - Trade payables
Interpretation
Negative = cash released
Positive = financing needed

80 042 €

Customer credit (2017) ?
Customer credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term granted to customers.
Formula
(Customer receivables / Revenue incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
< 45j : Good
45-60j : Average
> 60j : Long

70 j

Supplier credit (2017) ?
Supplier credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term obtained from suppliers.
Formula
(Trade payables / Purchases incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
The longer the term, the better for cash flow

61 j

Inventory turnover (2017) ?
Inventory turnover (days)
Definition
Average storage duration for goods or materials.
Formula
(Inventory / Cost of goods) x 360
Interpretation
The lower the ratio, the faster the turnover

8 j

WCR in days of revenue (2017) ?
WCR in days of revenue
Definition
Expresses working capital requirement in days of revenue.
Formula
(Operating WCR / Revenue) x 360
Interpretation
The fewer days, the better the working capital management

52 j

WCR and payment terms evolution
IPEB

Positioning of IPEB in its sector

Comparison with sector Construction d'autres bâtiments

Valuation estimate

Indicative estimate only : the number of comparable transactions in this sector is limited (25 transactions). This range of 110 452€ to 359 026€ is provided for information purposes only and requires in-depth analysis to be confirmed.

Estimated enterprise value 2017
Indicative
110k€ 231k€ 359k€
231 820 € Range: 110 452€ - 359 026€
NAF 5 année 2017
How is this estimate calculated?

This estimate is based on the analysis of 25 actual transactions of similar company sales (same NAF code) registered with BODACC between 2016 and 2025.

  • EBITDA Multiple: Preferred method for profitable SMEs. EBITDA reflects the ability to generate cash.
  • Revenue Multiple: Used for growing companies or those with low profitability. Reflects commercial potential.
  • Net Income Multiple: Relevant for mature companies with stable results.

This estimate is provided for information purposes only. A precise valuation requires in-depth analysis (assets, liabilities, prospects, market...).

Similar companies (Construction d'autres bâtiments)

Compare IPEB with other companies in the same sector:

Frequently asked questions about IPEB

What is the revenue of IPEB ?

The revenue of IPEB in 2017 is 555 k€.

Is IPEB profitable?

Yes, IPEB generated a net profit of 49 k€ in 2017.

Where is the headquarters of IPEB ?

The headquarters of IPEB is located in VAIRES-SUR-MARNE (77360), in the department Seine-et-Marne.

Where to find the tax return of IPEB ?

The tax return of IPEB is available on this page. Click on a year in the 'Data by year' section to view the account details (assets, liabilities, income statement). Data comes from INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property).

In which sector does IPEB operate?

IPEB operates in the sector Construction d'autres bâtiments (NAF code 41.20B). See the 'Sector positioning' section above to compare the company with its competitors.