INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS : revenue, balance sheet and financial ratios

INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS is a French company founded 24 years ago, specialized in the sector Conseil en systèmes et logiciels informatiques. Based in SAINT-NAZAIRE (44600), this company of category PME shows in 2017 a revenue of 294 k€. Find below the complete financial statements, solvency ratios, working capital requirements and sector comparison.

Data updated on 2026-05-02

Sources : INPI & INSEE SIRENE - Processing : Ministry of Economy

Financial history - INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS (SIREN 437874183)
Indicator 2020 2017 2016
Revenue N/C 294 304 € 299 294 €
Net income 878 € 9 941 € 10 133 €
EBITDA N/C 11 035 € 12 534 €
Net margin N/C 3.4% 3.4%

Revenue and income statement

In 2020, INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS generates positive net income of 878 €. Net income represents the final profit after all expenses (operating, financial, exceptional) and corporate tax. Change over 2016-2020: 10 k€ -> 878 €.

Net income (2020) ?
Net income
Definition
Profit or loss after all expenses, including taxes and exceptional items.
Formula
Current income + Exceptional income - Income tax

878 €

Loading income statement...

Chart evolution

Show :

Assets

Loading data...

Liabilities

Loading data...

Solvency and debt ratios

The debt ratio (= Financial debt / Equity x 100) stands at 84%. Debt level is high: negotiating margin with banks is reduced. Financial autonomy (= Equity / Total assets x 100) reaches 44%. This high autonomy means the company finances most of its assets through equity, a sign of strength.

Debt ratio (2020) ?
Debt ratio
Definition
Measures the proportion of debt to equity.
Formula
(Financial debt / Equity) x 100
Interpretation
< 50% : Low
50-100% : Moderate
> 100% : High

83.571%

Financial autonomy (2020) ?
Financial autonomy
Definition
Share of equity in the company's total financing.
Formula
(Equity / Total assets) x 100
Interpretation
> 30% : Good autonomy
20-30% : Average
< 20% : Low

43.796%

Solvency indicators evolution
INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS

Sector positioning

Debt ratio
83.57 2020
2016
2017
2020
Q1: 0.0
Med: 5.02
Q3: 54.02
Average +50 pts over 3 years

In 2020, the debt ratio of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS ... (83.57) ranks above the median of the sector. This ratio measures the weight of debt relative to equity. A reduction effort could improve financial strength.

Financial autonomy
43.8% 2020
2016
2017
2020
Q1: 5.98%
Med: 31.14%
Q3: 57.5%
Good +26 pts over 3 years

In 2020, the financial autonomy of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS ... (43.8%) ranks above the median of the sector. This ratio represents the share of equity in total financing. This comfortable position offers an appreciable safety margin.

Repayment capacity
0.0 years 2017
2016
2017
Q1: 0.0 years
Med: 0.0 years
Q3: 0.4 years
Excellent

In 2017, the repayment capacity of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS ... (0.00) ranks in the bottom 25% of the sector, which is positive. This ratio indicates the number of years needed to repay debt with cash flow. A short capacity reflects controlled debt and good cash generation.

Liquidity ratios

The liquidity ratio (= Current assets / Current liabilities) stands at 471.10. Concretely, the company has €2 of liquid assets for every €1 of short-term debt: no cash risk within 12 months.

Liquidity ratio (2020) ?
Liquidity ratio
Definition
Ability to meet short-term debts with current assets.
Formula
Current assets / Current liabilities
Interpretation
> 1.5 : Very good
1-1.5 : Fair
< 1 : Liquidity risk

471.102

Liquidity indicators evolution
INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS

Sector positioning

Liquidity ratio
471.1 2020
2016
2017
2020
Q1: 150.35
Med: 237.18
Q3: 412.61
Excellent +50 pts over 3 years

In 2020, the liquidity ratio of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS ... (471.10) ranks in the top 25% of the sector. This ratio measures the ability to cover short-term debt with current assets. A ratio above 1 ensures comfortable coverage of short-term maturities.

Interest coverage
0.0x 2017
2016
2017
Q1: 0.0x
Med: 0.0x
Q3: 0.6x
Average

In 2017, the interest coverage of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS ... (0.0x) ranks below the median of the sector. This ratio indicates how many times operating income covers interest expenses. An improvement would strengthen the competitive position.

Working capital requirement (WCR) and payment terms

Working capital requirement (WCR) measures the cash timing gap between customer collections and supplier/inventory payments.

Operating WCR (2020) ?
Operating WCR
Definition
Financing requirement generated by the operating cycle (inventory + receivables - trade payables).
Formula
Inventory + Customer receivables - Trade payables
Interpretation
Negative = cash released
Positive = financing needed

0 €

Customer credit (2020) ?
Customer credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term granted to customers.
Formula
(Customer receivables / Revenue incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
< 45j : Good
45-60j : Average
> 60j : Long

0 j

Supplier credit (2020) ?
Supplier credit (days)
Definition
Average payment term obtained from suppliers.
Formula
(Trade payables / Purchases incl. VAT) x 360
Interpretation
The longer the term, the better for cash flow

0 j

Inventory turnover (2020) ?
Inventory turnover (days)
Definition
Average storage duration for goods or materials.
Formula
(Inventory / Cost of goods) x 360
Interpretation
The lower the ratio, the faster the turnover

0 j

WCR and payment terms evolution
INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS

Positioning of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS in its sector

Comparison with sector Conseil en systèmes et logiciels informatiques

Valuation estimate

Indicative estimate only : the number of comparable transactions in this sector is limited (27 transactions). This range of 348€ to 3 371€ is provided for information purposes only and requires in-depth analysis to be confirmed.

Estimated enterprise value 2020
Indicative
0k€ 0k€ 3k€
762 € Range: 348€ - 3 371€
NAF 5 année 2020

Valuation evolution

How is this estimate calculated?

This estimate is based on the analysis of 27 actual transactions of similar company sales (same NAF code) registered with BODACC between 2016 and 2025.

  • EBITDA Multiple: Preferred method for profitable SMEs. EBITDA reflects the ability to generate cash.
  • Revenue Multiple: Used for growing companies or those with low profitability. Reflects commercial potential.
  • Net Income Multiple: Relevant for mature companies with stable results.

This estimate is provided for information purposes only. A precise valuation requires in-depth analysis (assets, liabilities, prospects, market...).

Similar companies (Conseil en systèmes et logiciels informatiques)

Compare INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS with other companies in the same sector:

Voir toutes les statistiques du secteur Conseil en systèmes et logiciels informatiques

Frequently asked questions about INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS

What is the revenue of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS ?

The revenue of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS in 2017 is 294 k€.

Is INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS profitable?

Yes, INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS generated a net profit of 878€ in 2020.

Where is the headquarters of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS ?

The headquarters of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS is located in SAINT-NAZAIRE (44600), in the department Loire-Atlantique.

Where to find the tax return of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS ?

The tax return of INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS is available on this page. Click on a year in the 'Data by year' section to view the account details (assets, liabilities, income statement). Data comes from INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property).

In which sector does INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS operate?

INFORMATIQUE TRAITEMENTS METHODES & CONCEPTS operates in the sector Conseil en systèmes et logiciels informatiques (NAF code 62.02A). See the 'Sector positioning' section above to compare the company with its competitors.